ZELFS DE TELEGRAAF ZIET HET NIET MEER ZITTEN MET DE KINDERVERKRACHTERS MET BLAUW BLOED * Q HEEFT HET AL ZO VAAK GEZEGD: ‘NEVER INTERFERE WITH AN ENEMY THAT IS IN THE PROCESS OF DESTROYING HIMSELF’ * NEDERLANDSE ROYALS NOG VELE MALEN ERGER EN SATANISCHER DAN HUN ENGELSE PEDO-VRIENDEN * DIT ZIJN EPISCHE TIJDEN: DE COMPLETE ELITE WORDT EXPOSED ALS WEERZINWEKKENDE CRIMINELEN, VERKRACHTERS EN MOORDENAARS * LEES HIER ONS VERHAAL OVER TANTE KAJSA EN DE BABYETERS-ZIEKTE KURU * ZIE OOK NIBURU.CO
DOOR DE KRANKZINNIGE (EN PEPERDURE) ADVIEZEN VAN DE PEDO-SPINDOCTORS VAN HILL & KNOWLTON -ZOALS DAT DEZE FOTO ‘FAKE’ ZOU ZIJN- GRAAFT DE PEDO-PRINS IN IJLTEMPO ZIJN EIGEN GRAF
If, as many royal observers have claimed, the Duke of York’s decision to submit himself to an Emily Maitlis grilling represented a colossal gamble by a man desperate to make the relentless flow of negative headlines dry up, then it appears he has bet the house on red only for it to come up black.
Prince Andrew’s bizarre defence that he chose to stay at convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s home because it was “convenient” and that it was the “honourable” thing to do has gone down badly in the court of public opinion. And now his defence of their relationship and his explanations for where he was on key dates when he is alleged to have had sex with women procured by Epstein are likely to meet similar derision. After the initial excerpts of the duke’s interview for BBC’s Newsnight were released to the media, many questioned why the prince was being interviewed by a journalist rather than the police or lawyers for the late Epstein’s victims, who include Virginia Giuffre, formerly known as Virginia Roberts, who claims she was 17 when she was forced to have sex with the duke. The duke told Maitlis: LEES VERDER BIJ THE GUARDIAN